2 Feb
2012
2 Feb
'12
3:41 p.m.
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 12:15:52PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On 2/2/12, Richard Zhao richard.zhao@linaro.org wrote:
Without imx-sgtl5000.c in place, this patch only introduces dead code at the moment.
Each patch make sense too without sgtl5000.
Well, as this patch goal is to provide audio support to mx6sabrelite, we need imx-sgtl5000 in place to test it, right?
My goal seem less important here. You see I'm adding more and more things into the patch series, which is out of my goal. The maintainers only consider right patch go to right git.
How can we know that don't get a kernel oops or something?
patch pass building is possible go to upstream too.
Regards,
Fabio Estevam