25 Feb
2014
25 Feb
'14
8:30 a.m.
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 02:17:00 +0000 "Li.Xiubo@freescale.com" Li.Xiubo@freescale.com wrote:
@@ -169,22 +164,26 @@ static int asoc_simple_card_parse_of(struct device_node *node, /* CPU sub-node */ ret = -EINVAL; np = of_get_child_by_name(node, "simple-audio-card,cpu");
- if (np)
- if (np) { ret = asoc_simple_card_sub_parse_of(np, priv->daifmt, &priv->cpu_dai, &dai_link->cpu_of_node, &dai_link->cpu_dai_name);
of_node_put(np);
Does the of_node_put(np) is really needed here ?
[snip]
Yes, of_get_child_by_name() increments the node refcount and np is not used afterwards.
But, you are right, this creates a bug in the next patch when using of_get_next_child(). I will fix it.
Thanks.
--
Ken ar c'hentaƱ | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/