On 12/18/2015 04:56 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 03:35:38 +0100, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
Commit 5f3d57ebdda4de30e00e2d7c45b5247e5410fe6b introduced a
Please give the subject not only the commit ID. (And I can't find this ID in linux-next tree.)
My bad, cherry-pick on my development branch changed the ID. Thanks for pointing this out. It is in Mark's for-next branch (which is what all these patches apply against)
commit 95f098014815b330838b1173d3d7bcea3b481242 Author: Vinod Koul vinod.koul@intel.com Date: Thu Nov 5 21:34:11 2015 +0530
ASoC: Intel: Move apci find machine routines
regression in ACPI probe of the DPCM driver. Fix by conditionally compiling sst-acpi when the DPCM driver is not selected
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
sound/soc/intel/common/Makefile | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/common/Makefile b/sound/soc/intel/common/Makefile index 3b9332e..668fdee 100644 --- a/sound/soc/intel/common/Makefile +++ b/sound/soc/intel/common/Makefile @@ -1,5 +1,10 @@ snd-soc-sst-dsp-objs := sst-dsp.o +ifneq ($(CONFIG_SND_SST_IPC_ACPI),) +snd-soc-sst-acpi-objs := sst-match-acpi.o +else snd-soc-sst-acpi-objs := sst-acpi.o sst-match-acpi.o +endif
A simpler version is like
snd-soc-sst-acpi-objs := sst-match-acpi.o snd-soc-sst-acpi-$(CONFIG_SND_SST_IPC_ACPI) += sst-acpi.o
Takashi