On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 09:14:28 -0800, Ranjani Sridharan wrote:
During Coldboot stress tests, system encountered the following panic. Panic logs depicts rt5682_i2c_shutdown() happened first and then later jack detect handler workqueue function triggered. This situation causes panic as rt5682_i2c_shutdown() resets codec. Fix this panic by cancelling all jack detection delayed work.
Panic log: [ 20.936124] sof_pci_shutdown [ 20.940248] snd_sof_device_shutdown [ 20.945023] snd_sof_shutdown [ 21.126849] rt5682_i2c_shutdown [ 21.286053] rt5682_jack_detect_handler [ 21.291235] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000037c [ 21.299302] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [ 21.305254] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page [ 21.311218] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 21.314155] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI [ 21.319206] CPU: 2 PID: 123 Comm: kworker/2:3 Tainted: G U 5.4.68 #10 [ 21.333687] ACPI: Preparing to enter system sleep state S5 [ 21.337669] Workqueue: events_power_efficient rt5682_jack_detect_handler [snd_soc_rt5682] [ 21.337671] RIP: 0010:rt5682_jack_detect_handler+0x6c/0x279 [snd_soc_rt5682]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: rt5682: Fix panic in rt5682_jack_detect_handler happening during system shutdown commit: 45a2702ce10993eda7a5b12690294782d565519c
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark