Mark,
I'll re-submit the patch series using twl6040_codec instead of twl6030_codec, twl6030 is the power companion chip and twl4030 is the audio chip, so in the case of this patch should I send an incremental patch to rename it?
Regards, Margarita
-----Original Message----- From: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 7:23 AM To: Samuel Ortiz Cc: Liam Girdwood; Olaya, Margarita; alsa-devel@alsa-project.org; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 1/7] OMAP4: PMIC: Add support for twl6030 codec
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:13:29PM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
Samuel are you OK with this ?
That seems fine, yes. Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz sameo@linux.intel.com
OK, I've applied this one now - the cross tree issues mean it seems better to get into 2.6.34. I'll review the rest of the patches now.