On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 09:12:39AM +0900, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Mark Brown
So, I just said to the SPEAr guys that I really want to see support for non-cyclic dmaengine added to the helper library rather than open coding. ?We're seeing lots of platforms moving to dmaengine (as well as
Do you mean you don't accept our platform/machine driver's patches unless your DMA library will have supported non-cyclic dmaengine ? Or if I'll modify your minor comments, can you accept our patches ?
I really want to see the dmaengine interaction factored out into a library. Like I say we've got lots of platforms doing this all being submitted at the same time, plus most of the work already there in the form of the base library. It shouldn't be too much work for the various platforms to collaborate on factoring this code out.