10 Jul
2008
10 Jul
'08
7 p.m.
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 05:52:50PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Wed, 9 Jul 2008 20:31:38 +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 02:15:26AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Wed, 9 Jul 2008 19:50:59 +0200,
If there are shared interrupts, they could be called before the initialization below. So, safer to move after the init.
they can't be shared and it's already done before any hardware init.
Then any reason to pass IRQF_SHARED?
of course not. I'll remove it.
v2 still has it...
I know, I've sent it earlier. Just wanted to give v2 a little time, if something else pops up. If everything else is ok, I'll respin a v3 with just the IRQF_SHARED removed.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessary a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]