27 Nov
2018
27 Nov
'18
4:52 p.m.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 1:02 PM Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 03:57:48 +0100, Ayman Bagabas wrote:
handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&inputdev->dev);
args[0].type = args[1].type = args[2].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
args[1].integer.value = 0x04;
if (acpi_has_method(handle, method = "\\_SB.PCI0.LPCB.EC0.SPIN")) {
This looks ugly... And checkpatch also complains.
Good point. Actually another question is what handle do we get here? Can we check method name by relative path, i.e. "SPIN" / "WPIN" instead?
args[0].integer.value = 0;
args[2].integer.value = on ? 1 : 0;
} else if (acpi_has_method(handle, method = "\\_SB.PCI0.LPCB.EC0.WPIN")) {
args[0].integer.value = 1;
args[2].integer.value = on ? 0 : 1;
} else {
dev_err(&inputdev->dev, "Unable to find ACPI method\n");
return -ENOSYS;
}
Can these checks be done at initialization phase? It doesn't seem needed to be executed at each call.
Agree.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko