2 Mar
2020
2 Mar
'20
5:18 p.m.
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 08:52:01AM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
On 3/2/20 7:11 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 05:11:55PM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
base-commit: 6941b0b5f919e9839e8c25efaeb53854efee14e5
Since for-next gets rebuilt all the time it's not ideal to base things off, for-5.x branches are better. If you need dependencies it's fine though.
No dependencies expected, it's just to help buildbots understand what tree to use, and for-5.x is just fine indeed. Thanks for the feedback.
It's automated systems that I'm suggesting this for - testing against a throwaway branch isn't ideal since it doesn't reflect what'll actually happen with the series by default.