28 Apr
2011
28 Apr
'11
11:48 p.m.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:24:38PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
Hm. I won't argue to death here. I could only repeat what I've said before. But if we keep passing it indirectly we should at least make the struct opaque to the world outside of soc-dapm and move the update pointer from snd_soc_dapm_context to snd_soc_card.
Moving to the card doesn't seem helpful, while we're currently doing one update at once it's not immediately obvious that we want to keep doing that indefinitely. Like I've said before with the stream events it's not clear that we should still be using them any more, IIRC there's only one user which actually cares (tlv320dac33) and that would probably be perfectly happy with using events on an AIF widget.