On 4/18/20 11:53 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
On Sat, 2020-04-18 at 14:45 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
On Apr 18, 2020, at 2:41 PM, Randy Dunlap rdunlap@infradead.org wrote:
Fix gcc empty-body warning when -Wextra is used:
../fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:3898:3: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an ‘else’ statement [-Wempty-body]
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap rdunlap@infradead.org Cc: Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org Cc: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" bfields@fieldses.org Cc: Chuck Lever chuck.lever@oracle.com Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
I have a patch in my queue that addresses this particular warning, but your change works for me too.
Acked-by: Chuck Lever chuck.lever@oracle.com
Unless Bruce objects.
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- linux-next-20200417.orig/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c +++ linux-next-20200417/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
#include <linux/file.h> #include <linux/fs.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/namei.h> #include <linux/swap.h> @@ -3895,7 +3896,7 @@ nfsd4_setclientid(struct svc_rqst *rqstp copy_clid(new, conf); gen_confirm(new, nn); } else /* case 4 (new client) or cases 2, 3 (client reboot): */
;
new->cl_minorversion = 0; gen_callback(new, setclid, rqstp); add_to_unconfirmed(new);do_empty();
This empty else seems silly and could likely be better handled by a comment above the first if, something like:
/* for now only handle case 1: probable callback update */ if (conf && same_verf(&conf->cl_verifier, &clverifier)) { copy_clid(new, conf); gen_confirm(new, nn); }
with no else use.
I'll just let Chuck handle it with his current patch, whatever it is.
thanks.