12 Jan
2011
12 Jan
'11
5:02 p.m.
At Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:44:07 +0200, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Hanno Böck hanno@hboeck.de wrote:
struct snd_ac97_build_ops {
- int (*build_3d) (struct snd_ac97 *ac97);
- int (*build_specific) (struct snd_ac97 *ac97);
- int (*build_spdif) (struct snd_ac97 *ac97);
- int (*build_post_spdif) (struct snd_ac97 *ac97);
- int (* const build_3d) (struct snd_ac97 *ac97);
- int (* const build_specific) (struct snd_ac97 *ac97);
- int (* const build_spdif) (struct snd_ac97 *ac97);
- int (* const build_post_spdif) (struct snd_ac97 *ac97);
#ifdef CONFIG_PM
- void (*suspend) (struct snd_ac97 *ac97);
- void (*resume) (struct snd_ac97 *ac97);
- void (* const suspend) (struct snd_ac97 *ac97);
- void (* const resume) (struct snd_ac97 *ac97);
#endif
- void (*update_jacks) (struct snd_ac97 *ac97); /* for jack-sharing */
- /* for jack-sharing */
- void (* const update_jacks) (struct snd_ac97 *ac97);
Can we please not do this.
You made whole ops structure RO, this is enough.
Yes. Hanno, could you fix and resubmit?
thanks,
Takashi