Chris, Jeeja already has a patch that fix this issue in bug 100419, this also "happens" to be identical to a patch a sent on an internal mail to Intel audio developers on the 5 of April. But, then they replied they wanted another solution. I guess it is up to audio dev to decide what solution they want.
/Marta
-----Original Message----- From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Chris Wilson Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2017 1:42 PM To: Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de Cc: Koul, Vinod vinod.koul@intel.com; Kp, Jeeja jeeja.kp@intel.com; alsa-devel@alsa-project.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; # v4 . 7+ stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ALSA: hda: Use loop counter for hdac_wait_for_cmd_dmas() timeout
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 12:25:26PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Thu, 04 May 2017 12:18:29 +0200, Chris Wilson wrote:
hdac_wait_for_cmd_dmas() uses a jiffie timeout to ensure that we do not wait forever for stuck hardware. However, it is called from an irq-disabled context which prevents jiffie from advancing and so the loop doesn't terminate if the hardware fails. This can then cause NMI watchdog warnings, such as:
NMI watchdog: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 3 Modules linked in: snd_hda_intel i915 vgem snd_hda_codec_hdmix86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic ghash_clmulni_intel e1000e snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_hda_core snd_pcm ptp mei_me prime_numbers pps_core mei lpc_ich i2c_hid i2c_designware_platform i2c_designware_core [last unloaded: i915]
irq event stamp: 13366 hardirqs last enabled at (13365): [<ffffffff81891a87>]_raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x50
hardirqs last disabled at (13366): [<ffffffff818918d2>]_raw_spin_lock_irq+0x12/0x50
softirqs last enabled at (12744): [<ffffffff81085c79>]__do_softirq+0x1d9/0x4c0
softirqs last disabled at (12721): [<ffffffff810860d9>] irq_exit+0xa9/0xc0 CPU: 3 PID: 10443 Comm: kworker/u8:11 Tainted: G U 4.11.0-rc4-CI-CI_DRM_319+ #1
Hardware name: /NUC5i5RYB, BIOSRYBDWi35.86A.0362.2017.0118.0940 01/18/2017
Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn task: ffff88024cd32740 task.stack: ffffc9000162c000 RIP: 0010:preempt_count_add+0xe/0xc0 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000162fbd8 EFLAGS: 00000082 RAX: 0000000080000001 RBX: 0000000704b96558 RCX:0000000000000002
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff81c74f2d RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: ffffc9000162fc08 R08: 00000000bbcc90cc R09: 23c7b07100000000 R10: ffffffff827901a8 R11: ffff88024cd32740 R12: 0000000704b92baa R13: 0000000000003ea0 R14: 0000000000000003 R15: ffffffffa00061f0 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff880256d80000(0000)knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f90f84a5144 CR3: 0000000003e0f000 CR4: 00000000003406e0 Call Trace: ? delay_tsc+0x3d/0xc0 __delay+0xa/0x10 __const_udelay+0x31/0x40 snd_hdac_bus_stop_cmd_io+0x96/0xe0 [snd_hda_core] ? azx_dev_disconnect+0x20/0x20 [snd_hda_intel] snd_hdac_bus_stop_chip+0xb1/0x100 [snd_hda_core] azx_stop_chip+0x9/0x10 [snd_hda_codec] azx_suspend+0x72/0x220 [snd_hda_intel] pci_pm_suspend+0x71/0x140 dpm_run_callback+0x6f/0x330 ? pci_pm_freeze+0xe0/0xe0 __device_suspend+0xf9/0x370 ? dpm_watchdog_set+0x60/0x60 async_suspend+0x1a/0x90 async_run_entry_fn+0x34/0x160 process_one_work+0x1f4/0x6d0 ? process_one_work+0x16e/0x6d0 worker_thread+0x49/0x4a0 kthread+0x107/0x140 ? process_one_work+0x6d0/0x6d0 ? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x2e/0x40Fixes: 38b19ed7f81e ("ALSA: hda: fix to wait for RIRB & CORB DMA to set") Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100419 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: Jeeja KP jeeja.kp@intel.com Cc: Vinod Koul vinod.koul@intel.com Cc: Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.7+
Any reason to submit a different fix from what's attached in the bugzilla you mentioned?
Because I didn't see it when Marta complained on irc and suggested reverting 38b19ed7f81e. There's no advantage either way, but even after fixing the timeout detection we are still left with the issue that the hw is stuck and suffer a 200ms suspend delay. :| -Chris
-- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx