9 Jul
2019
9 Jul
'19
3:25 p.m.
On Mon, 08 Jul 2019 13:04:48 +0200, Adam Miartus wrote:
From: Andreas Pape apape@de.adit-jv.com
Signed-off-by: Andreas Pape apape@de.adit-jv.com Signed-off-by: Adam Miartus amiartus@de.adit-jv.com
No description isn't good at all. There must be something you can explain in details here.
About the changes:
+#define PCM_UNSUPPORTED_ERR (-ENOSYS) +void snd_pcm_unsupported_dump(snd_pcm_t *pcm, snd_output_t *out) +{
- snd_output_printf(out, "unsupported\n");
+}
IMO, we don't need to show anything if it's dummy. And, maybe it's more straightforward to let the PCM core allow NULL ops?
thanks,
Takashi