adding Eric BĂ©nard.
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 09:58:07PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 09:09:03PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 05:24:28PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 05:11:34PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 04:55:23PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 10:12:05AM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao richard.zhao@linaro.org
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx31ads.c | 10 ++++++++++ arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/mx31.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Hmm, let's see who are actually using mxc_audmux_v2_configure_port().
$ git grep -n mxc_audmux_v2_configure_port arch/arm/ arch/arm/mach-imx/eukrea_mbimxsd25-baseboard.c:246: mxc_audmux_v2_configure_port(0, arch/arm/mach-imx/eukrea_mbimxsd25-baseboard.c:254: mxc_audmux_v2_configure_port(4, arch/arm/mach-imx/eukrea_mbimxsd35-baseboard.c:257: mxc_audmux_v2_configure_port(0, arch/arm/mach-imx/eukrea_mbimxsd35-baseboard.c:265: mxc_audmux_v2_configure_port(3, arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-pcm043.c:365: mxc_audmux_v2_configure_port(3, arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-pcm043.c:371: mxc_audmux_v2_configure_port(0,
It's machine specific code, though audmux driver is common. Might be ok? The asoc machine file for the above 3 boards is not platform driver, and don't get any plat info.
Sascha, Any suggestion? I saw pcm043 board was added by you.
I didn't grep arch/arm. where is pc043 asoc machine file?
It seems to be sound/soc/imx/phycore-ac97.c.
You see, we're not famaliar with the boards.
As we are moving audmux into sound/soc/imx, it makes less sense to still keep these calls in board files.
It don't corrupt git bisect. We don't have to include it in this patch.
It's logically part of this series.
I don't know much about the above boards and I can not test either. I think I have to leave it to other volunteers. I mainly focus on audmux itself.
Instead, I prefer to call it from machine driver like what wm1133-ev1 does below.
Maybe pass the info as asoc machine driver pdata.
Sorry, they're not platform drivers.
Sounds good.
Or we can simply make the it a audmux-self call with 3 parameters it needs retrieved from platform_data or device tree, so that machine driver does not even bother with the call. Makes sense?
audux configuration may change after initial set. For example, it may use one configuration for audio playback, but use another when you connect a BT audio device.
Right. I forgot this point.
-- Regards, Shawn