19 Jan
2012
19 Jan
'12
7:33 p.m.
On 01/19/2012 07:26 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 07:24:13PM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
The core implementation applies the msbits constraint to samples where it should not. Do not ask core to do this, the original code does the right thing.
Peter, grow up. With my last patch (well, a typo fixed version of it) userspace will do what you want.
If you actually read the thread it was one of my problem. It might not bother you that we are wasting CPU cycles for nothing, but it annoys me. This is the reason we need to update the CPUs every 2 years.
Please take this series. I'm not going to allow that the TI drivers will waste CPU cycles (for nothing).
--
Péter