-----Original Message----- From: Vinod Koul vkoul@kernel.org Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 1:11 PM To: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com Cc: Bard Liao yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com; alsa-devel@alsa- project.org; tiwai@suse.de; gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; linux- kernel@vger.kernel.org; ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com; hui.wang@canonical.com; broonie@kernel.org; srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org; jank@cadence.com; Lin, Mengdong mengdong.lin@intel.com; Kale, Sanyog R sanyog.r.kale@intel.com; rander.wang@linux.intel.com; Liao, Bard bard.liao@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] ASoC: soundwire: Move sdw stream operations to
On 03-09-20, 09:05, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
On 9/3/20 5:42 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On 01-09-20, 23:02, Bard Liao wrote:
sdw stream operation APIs can be called once per stream. dailink callbacks are good places to call these APIs.
Again, please mention here if this is to be merged thru sdw tree or ASoC tree
Good point, I thought it wouldn't matter but it does. I just gave it a try and there seems to be a conflict on Mark's tree w/ drivers/soundwire/intel.c (likely due to missing patches already added to
Vinod's tree).
So this should go to Vinod's tree with Mark's Acked-by tag on the ASoC changes.
Alternatively we can also split this in two, with ASoC-only and SoundWire-only patches in separate series if it's easier for maintainers. We would lose the rationale for the changes but that's not
essential.
If there are no dependencies on each other, that is best preferred option. One should mention in cover-letter about the linked series though.
Sent as v2