Hi,
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 09:07:36AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
- Sebastian Reichel sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk [180308 09:47]:
Hi Lee,
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 04:32:11PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
+static const struct mfd_cell cpcap_mfd_devices[] = {
[...]
- }, {
.name = "cpcap-led",.id = 4,.of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-cp",- }, {
.name = "cpcap-codec",- }
+};
With none of the entries containing platform_data /me wonders why you can't still use devm_of_platform_populate()?
Because devm_of_platform_populate works with compatible properties and cpcap-codec does not have one after I removed it for Mark.
How about keep devm_of_platform_populate() for the ones that already have compatible. Then add a table entry for cpcap-codec only and call devm_mfd_add_devices()?
This should work. I think it makes sense to wait for Rob Herring's feedback on the binding. My understanding is, that he has the last word on binding questions and I would like to avoid changing this back and forth.
-- Sebastian