24 Sep
2015
24 Sep
'15
12:46 p.m.
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:42:28 +0200, Dan Carpenter wrote:
As far as I can see, having an invalid ->tstamp_mode is harmless, but adding a check silences a static checker warning.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpenter@oracle.com
Applied, thanks.
Takashi
diff --git a/sound/core/pcm_native.c b/sound/core/pcm_native.c index 75888dd..4863af5 100644 --- a/sound/core/pcm_native.c +++ b/sound/core/pcm_native.c @@ -650,7 +650,8 @@ static int snd_pcm_sw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, } snd_pcm_stream_unlock_irq(substream);
- if (params->tstamp_mode > SNDRV_PCM_TSTAMP_LAST)
- if (params->tstamp_mode < 0 ||
return -EINVAL; if (params->proto >= SNDRV_PROTOCOL_VERSION(2, 0, 12) && params->tstamp_type > SNDRV_PCM_TSTAMP_TYPE_LAST)params->tstamp_mode > SNDRV_PCM_TSTAMP_LAST)