1 Sep
2014
1 Sep
'14
12:18 p.m.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 09:41:47PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 06:20:44PM +0530, Subhransu S. Prusty wrote:
- /*allocate device type context*/
- sst_init_stream(&sst_drv_ctx->streams[str_id], alloc_param.codec_type,
str_id, alloc_param.operation, 0);- /* send msg to FW to allocate a stream */
/*spaces around the edge of comments like the second not the first*/
This is an issue in quite a lot of places.
will remove.
+/** +* sst_start_stream - Send msg for a starting stream
/*
sst_fill_header_mrfld(&msg->mrfld_header, IPC_CMD,str_info->task_id, 1, pvt_id);msg->mrfld_header.p.header_high.part.res_rqd = 1;len = sizeof(dsp_hdr);msg->mrfld_header.p.header_low_payload = len;sst_fill_header_dsp(&dsp_hdr,IPC_IA_RESUME_STREAM_MRFLD,str_info->pipe_id, 0);memcpy(msg->mailbox_data, &dsp_hdr, sizeof(dsp_hdr));sst_add_to_dispatch_list_and_post(sst_drv_ctx, msg);retval = sst_wait_timeout(sst_drv_ctx, block);sst_free_block(sst_drv_ctx, block);Can any of this be factored out? Seems like a lot of duplication in these operations.
Will check.
--