28 Jan
2013
28 Jan
'13
11:49 a.m.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 01:34:49AM -0800, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 02:44:42PM +0800, Mark Brown wrote: No you read it right. We need to change a little and yes take a copy of it. That way you can modify the copy locally for your device rather that updating the system while avoiding two defines :)
I can update the patch to create a new copy for each device however, I am not sure I prefer this approach. It seems highly likely that presence or not of copy will be the only difference been devices that is ever present. So making dynamic copies per device for what will only ever be two distinct items feels excessive compared to the cost of carrying one extra static struct.
Charles