Hi Jonathan,
On 06/06/2011 04:31 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On 06/06/11 01:47, Greg Dietsche wrote:
the code always returns ret regardless, so if(ret) check is unecessary.
Good point, though please spell check your commit messages. unecessary -> unnecessary
oops! usually I'm the guy critiquing spelling :)
Also if you want to do this sort of cleanup, please also fix the equivalent in wm8940_resume and wm8940_add_widgets. Ack is for what is here, plus those if you do them.
I will take a look at these, but it might be a few days. I used coccinelle to create this patch and my semantic patch wasn't 'smart' enough to find them.
Just as an aside, there is no earthly point in cc'ing lkml for a simple cleanup like this. Just adds to already huge amount of noise!
Thanks for all of your feedback. In your opinion, what is the best way for someone such as myself to send patches like these? I read in Documentation/SubmittingPatches "Unless you have a reason NOT to do so, CC linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org"
Also, for this embarrassing spelling problem... do I submit a new patch? :)
Thanks, Greg