19 Jun
2011
19 Jun
'11
7:01 p.m.
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 03:41:02PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 03:10:46PM +0100, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
Yes that's true. That was a quick fix to temporarily take care of this problem.
With something like this I think it's probably as well to just revert the original commit until we've got things sorted out, having the feature sort of implemented but totally unusuble is probably worse than not having it at all.
Yea indeed.