Sunday 23 August 2009 20:05:43 Mark Brown wrote:
If none of your patches have been applied
Mark,
I did not say that. You have applied patches 2/3 [1] and 3/3 [2] from the series.
then what are the other patches that depend on this? Nobody reported any issues in testing with the other OMAP patches.
Dependency on patch 1/3 is not compile time, but run time, and OMAP1510 specific, that's probably why nobody has reported any issues.
I don't really mind which tree these go via but I rather suspect that ALSA will be better given all the other changes and I also suspect that you'll need to regenerate your changes against a current tree due to those changes.
arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c has not been touched since 2009-05-28 in yours [3] and since 2009-06-23 in Takashi's tree, so my patch, whether original or v2, should still be up to date. That may change if it is to be pushed via OMAP tree.
Sorry for all that noise.
Thanks, Janusz
[1]http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6... [2]http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound-2.6.git;a=commit;h=4... [3]http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound-2.6.git;a=commit;h=4... [4]http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound-2.6.git;a=commit;h=aec...