10 Jul
2014
10 Jul
'14
3:22 p.m.
Takashi Iwai wrote:
@@ -1899,6 +1918,7 @@ int snd_pcm_dump_sw_setup(snd_pcm_t *pcm, snd_output_t *out) return -EIO; } snd_output_printf(out, " tstamp_mode : %s\n", snd_pcm_tstamp_mode_name(pcm->tstamp_mode));
- snd_output_printf(out, " tstamp_type : %s\n", snd_pcm_tstamp_type_name(pcm->tstamp_mode));
@@ -5613,6 +5634,7 @@ int snd_pcm_sw_params_current(snd_pcm_t *pcm, snd_pcm_sw_params_t *params) int snd_pcm_sw_params_dump(snd_pcm_sw_params_t *params, snd_output_t *out) { snd_output_printf(out, "tstamp_mode: %s\n", snd_pcm_tstamp_mode_name(params->tstamp_mode));
- snd_output_printf(out, "tstamp_type: %s\n", snd_pcm_tstamp_type_name(params->tstamp_mode));
_type, not _mode
Regards, Clemens