Re: [alsa-devel] Rationale behind snd_pcm_htimestamp()

On Wed, 25.02.09 16:13, Takashi Iwai (tiwai@suse.de) wrote:

...

Hmm, so I understood you correctly then the API would need changing to get the timestamp, the delay and the avail value that belong together?

Yes, if you stick with snd_pcm_htimetamp(), snd_pcm_avil() and co.

But basically snd_pcm_status() does sync and fetch all status data. Shouldn't calling this suffice for your purpose?

Hmm, so snd_pcm_status() does sync? Good to know. I'll then use that.

Lennart