10 Jan
2016
10 Jan
'16
12:58 p.m.
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 11:55:48AM +0100, Martin Sperl wrote:
So if someone with a better idea how to keep those dt-binding includes synchronized with the definitions used by the code step forward and propose a better solution how to get that implemented?
I guess there will be a few more occurrences of clocks that are currently not defined, which will need to get introduced in the future PWM and PCM were just the last in this series.
Presumably just making the code not rely on having a define for the number of clocks would deal with the problem (eg, using ARRAY_SIZE internally).