Use the new snd_pcm_hw_constraint_single() helper function rather than installing a list constraint with a single value. Since snd_pcm_hw_constraint_single() sets a static constraint while snd_pcm_hw_constraint_list() sets a dynamic constraint the former is slightly more efficient and it also needs less code.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen lars@metafoo.de --- sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c | 14 ++------------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c b/sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c index c445312..7a5c9a3 100644 --- a/sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c +++ b/sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c @@ -117,20 +117,10 @@ static int byt_codec_fixup(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, return 0; }
-static unsigned int rates_48000[] = { - 48000, -}; - -static struct snd_pcm_hw_constraint_list constraints_48000 = { - .count = ARRAY_SIZE(rates_48000), - .list = rates_48000, -}; - static int byt_aif1_startup(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream) { - return snd_pcm_hw_constraint_list(substream->runtime, 0, - SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_RATE, - &constraints_48000); + return snd_pcm_hw_constraint_single(substream->runtime, + SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_RATE, 48000); }
static struct snd_soc_ops byt_aif1_ops = {