Shawn Guo wrote:
That doesn't seem to be related to my point? I'm asking you to not reply to an old version of your patch series in order to post a new version of it, just post the new version.
This is the first version of this series.
I think there's a communication breakdown. Shawn, take a look at this:
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2012-February/thread.ht...
Search for "[alsa-devel] [PATCH 0/6] ASoC: a few cleanups on sound/soc/fsl".
You'll see that this email is indented, because it was posted to the mailing list AS A REPLY to "[alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/4] ASoC: imx: let SND_MXC_SOC_FIQ select FIQ". That's because it has this line in the message header:
In-Reply-To: 1329979644-31046-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org
This is what Mark is talking about. He wants new patch sets to be posted NOT as replies to other patch sets.