22 Nov
2019
22 Nov
'19
2:26 p.m.
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 14:13:54 +0100, Colin King wrote:
From: Colin Ian King colin.king@canonical.com
The return from pnp_irq is an unsigned integer type resource_size_t and hence the error check for a positive non-error code is always going to be true. A check for a non-failure return from pnp_irq should in fact be for (resource_size_t)-1 rather than >= 0.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Unsigned compared against 0") Fixes: a9824c868a2c ("[ALSA] Add CS4232 PnP BIOS support") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King colin.king@canonical.com
Applied, thanks.
Takashi