Hi Vinod
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 09:59 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
Hi Vinod
Thanks for your reply.
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 10:34 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
[snip]
How would you like to do this? Don't you think, it would be good to allow both: either implement a dmaengine driver directly, exactly as all drivers are doing now, or use the additional helper library for suitable (simple) hardware types? I see it similar to I2C, where you either implement an I2C driver directly, or you use the bitbanging abstraction for simpler hardware.
I think it would be good to have both, this can be used by folks who don't have sg support available.
Ok, so, should I just rename the driver to sgsoft? Is this the only change, that you'd like to see?
That would be one :) Also, I would review the other patch patches by today/tomorrow, you can add any changes in next version as well
Do I understand it right, that I'm waiting for your review before submitting the next version?
Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer http://www.open-technology.de/