20 Jan
2011
20 Jan
'11
9:11 a.m.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 09:57:28AM +0200, Tapio Vihuri wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 09:44 -0800, ext Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Hi Tapio,
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 02:06:54PM +0200, tapio.vihuri@nokia.com wrote:
- for (; key->type != KE_END; key++) {
switch (key->type) {
case KE_KEY:
__set_bit(key->keycode, eci->acc_input->keybit);
break;
case KE_SW:
case KE_VSW:
__set_bit(key->keycode, eci->acc_input->swbit);
break;
}
- }
Is this still needed? I believe sparse_keymap_setup() below shoudl take care of this...
- __set_bit(EV_KEY, eci->acc_input->evbit);
- __set_bit(EV_SW, eci->acc_input->evbit);
- __set_bit(EV_REP, eci->acc_input->evbit);
- err = sparse_keymap_setup(eci->acc_input, eci_keymap, NULL);
- if (err)
goto err_free_dev;
Hi Dmitry.
Thanks for pointing this out, as we have sparse keymap, we should use it :)
How about KE_VSW case ? Shouldn't it be in the sparse_keymap_setup {} also ?
Indeed. Does the patch below fix it?
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Input: sparse-keymap - fix KEY_VSW handling in sparse_keymap_setup
From: Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
We were forgetting to set up device capabilities for KEY_VSW entries.
Reported-by: Tapio Vihuri tapio.vihuri@nokia.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov dtor@mail.ru
---
drivers/input/sparse-keymap.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/sparse-keymap.c b/drivers/input/sparse-keymap.c
index a29a7812..7729e54 100644
--- a/drivers/input/sparse-keymap.c
+++ b/drivers/input/sparse-keymap.c
@@ -201,6 +201,7 @@ int sparse_keymap_setup(struct input_dev *dev,
break;
case KE_SW:
+ case KE_VSW:
__set_bit(EV_SW, dev->evbit);
__set_bit(entry->sw.code, dev->swbit);
break;