14 Feb
2015
14 Feb
'15
6:49 a.m.
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 02:32:12PM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 09:02:46PM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 01:31:53PM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
How about having it just record that it should parse the given property when the table in the card is being handleed rather than overwrite that?
You mean adding another pair of dapm_routes with num_dapm_routes for Device Tree or something like that?
That should work, I had been thinking of just recording where to parse from and deferring the parse entirely.
Okay. I'll try both approaches and choose a comparatively neater one.
Thanks Nicolin