Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: rsnd: don't use discriminatory terms for function names

Hi Hector, Mark

...

...

-u32 rsnd_ssi_multi_slaves_runtime(struct rsnd_dai_stream *io); +u32 rsnd_ssi_multi_followers_runtime(struct rsnd_dai_stream *io);

...

I don't have full context here, but AIUI this is about bundling different links together? If so, primary/secondary or main/secondary might work better than leader/follower, in my opinion. The latter implies more of a "one device follows another one" scenario, like for clocks.

That does make sense to me.

Thank you for your advice. I will use "secondary" in v2

Thank you for your help !!

Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto