18 Apr
2015
18 Apr
'15
1:39 p.m.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 02:57:49PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
On 04/15/2015 11:42 PM, Kevin Cernekee wrote:
- case TAS571X_ID_5711:
priv->codec_driver.controls = tas5711_controls;priv->codec_driver.num_controls = ARRAY_SIZE(tas5711_controls);break;- case TAS571X_ID_5717:
- case TAS571X_ID_5719:
priv->codec_driver.controls = tas5717_controls;priv->codec_driver.num_controls = ARRAY_SIZE(tas5717_controls);
Typically when a driver supports multiple chips with different control sets the snd_soc_codec_driver implements a probe callback in which the correct controls are registered.
I'm fine with doing it with tables (though just having two static CODEC driver structures would be a bit cleaner). The pattern with probe() is usually that there's some base set of controls all the devices have which then gets device specific controls/routes/whatever added to it so you get benefits fromm sharing the table but in this case the table is so tiny anyway that I'm not sure it's worth caring.