20 Jun
2015
20 Jun
'15
11:15 a.m.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:18:24PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:27:48PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
Should this be _SKYLAKE_HDA or something? I may be confused on product naming and terminology but I thought these processors had both HDA and non-HDA support (possibly in the same silicon at times)?
Unlike haswell or previous controllers, we dont have a separate HDA only controller and a separate I2S based controller, it is integrated now :)
So there will be only one Skylake controller :)
But this is specifically the HDA bits - I'd expect that there will be systems where people want Sky Lake support but don't need the HDA bits (possibly some of these more memory constrained ones)?