21 Nov
2007
21 Nov
'07
6:14 a.m.
At Tue, 20 Nov 2007 01:51:51 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Five more things I am wondering about, though:
- Wouldn't it make sense to have a "mono:" device similar to the other surround/front/rear devices? The single use case would be the mono-only usb webcam I mentioned above.
Hm, I don't think it's so useful since "mono" channel itself is not so common. The usefulness of "front" or "rear" is that the definition is relatively clear. But "mono" has no clear definition what it should be.
The addition of this new defintion would be easy, though...
Takashi