Hello,
I had written an `aseqsend` utility to send MIDI events from hex strings to ALSA sequencer ports, similar to the -S arg of `amidi`, but I just noticed that while sending events directly to application ALSA Sequencer ports works just fine, trying to send to a hardware MIDI port fails with -19 (-ENODEV).
Here's the aseqsend utility code, the highlighted line is the one returning -ENODEV:
https://github.com/BlokasLabs/aseqsend/blob/main/aseqsend.c#L173
Here's some sample commands showcasing the problem (I've added a printf with drain result just after the indicated line above locally):
https://paste.debian.net/hidden/9690d660/
It shows that in case there's no active subscriptions to the port, the event delivery fails, with no data ever reaching the hardware device. As long as there's at least one subscription to the port, it works ok. I've reproduced this on 5.15.36-rt41-v7+ and 6.6.58-v8-16k (running on Raspberry Pi, based on https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux)
I've traced the -ENODEV to be returned at this location: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.6.58/source/sound/core/seq/seq_midi.c#L1...
Whenever there's a subscription, the 'substream' is not NULL.
But what I would naturally expect is for the events to get delivered to the hardware port when using direct addressing, regardless of its subscription status, the same way how it's possible to send events to application aseq ports:
-- Terminal 1 -- patch@patchbox:~ $ aseqdump Waiting for data at port 128:0. Press Ctrl+C to end. Source Event Ch Data 129:0 Note on 0, note 64, velocity 48
-- Terminal 2 -- patch@patchbox:~/work/aseqsend $ ./aseqsend 128:0 90 40 30 drain: 0
Is this a bug in ALSA Sequencer, or is my expectation of being able to write directly to a hardware ALSA sequencer port incorrect?