Hi, Mark
I'm sorry for sending the unqualified patches two times. It's my first time to submit patch into kernels, so I'm in lack of the submitting experiences.
I'll read the documents carefully, and I want to submit a codec(CS24L51) driver patch in recently future. I hope everything will go with a swing at that time.
Thanks!
******************** Best regards! Allen (Rongrong) Cao Ambarella Shanghai Ltd. Tel: (86-21) 50942311 Fax: (86-21) 50942321
-----邮件原件----- 发件人: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com] 发送时间: 2009年7月11日 3:19 收件人: Rongrong Cao 抄送: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; trivial@kernel.org 主题: Re: [PATCH for-2.6.32] sound dapm: fix checking for external widgets bug
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 11:11:46PM -0700, Rongrong Cao wrote:
From: Rongrong Cao rrcao@ambarella.com
This patch is based on for-2.6.32 In SOC DAPM layer of SOUND subsystem, when add signal route (in the function snd_soc_dapm_add_route() ), the original code has wrong logic when dapm layer check each widget whether an external one.
This still doesn't apply. It looks like your MUA is corrupting the patch - it's MIME encoded everything and replaced all the tabs with spaces which is causing all the patch application programs I have to get confused. Documentation/email-clients.txt has some suggestions on how to configure various MUAs to send patches cleanly. Personally I always use git send-email. You probably also want to have a look at the instructions in Documentation/SubmittingPatches with regard to the formatting of your patch - the main thing being that the Signed-off-by should go before the patch content.
In any case, I've manually applied the patch so no need to resubmit it.
I also notice that you've CCed trivial@kernel.org. Please don't do that except for things that can't possibly cause bugs - a change like this doesn't really qualify since while the code clearly looks buggy it's always possible that the code is just obscure.