On 25/01/2024 09:27, neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote:
On 24/01/2024 08:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
Devices sharing a reset GPIO could use the reset framework for coordinated handling of that shared GPIO line. We have several cases of such needs, at least for Devicetree-based platforms.
If Devicetree-based device requests a reset line, while "resets" Devicetree property is missing but there is a "reset-gpios" one, instantiate a new "reset-gpio" platform device which will handle such reset line. This allows seamless handling of such shared reset-gpios without need of changing Devicetree binding [1].
To avoid creating multiple "reset-gpio" platform devices, store the Devicetree "reset-gpios" GPIO specifiers used for new devices on a linked list. Later such Devicetree GPIO specifier (phandle to GPIO controller, GPIO number and GPIO flags) is used to check if reset controller for given GPIO was already registered.
If two devices have conflicting "reset-gpios" property, e.g. with different ACTIVE_xxx flags, this would allow to spawn two separate "reset-gpio" devices, where the second would fail probing on busy GPIO request.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YXi5CUCEi7YmNxXM@robh.at.kernel.org/ [1] Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski brgl@bgdev.pl Cc: Chris Packham chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz Cc: Sean Anderson sean.anderson@seco.com Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Depends on previous of change.
drivers/reset/core.c | 215 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- include/linux/reset-controller.h | 4 + 2 files changed, 206 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/reset/core.c b/drivers/reset/core.c index 4d5a78d3c085..60a8a33c4419 100644 --- a/drivers/reset/core.c +++ b/drivers/reset/core.c
<snip>
- }
- ret = __reset_add_reset_gpio_lookup(id, args->np, args->args[0],
args->args[1]);What would happen with gpio controllers using #gpio-cells = <3> (or more) like allwinner,sun4i-a10-pinctrl.yaml ?
On this example the flags are args->args[2] so this would probably fail.
This would also fails badly with #gpio-cells = <1>, args->args[1] value would be undefined.
You should probably limit to args->args_count == 2 for now.
Hm, good point. Both cells are actually possible, so I need to check it. Thanks.
Best regards, Krzysztof