20 Nov
2007
20 Nov
'07
7:31 a.m.
At Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:09:12 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
Hi.
Takashi Iwai wrote:
Changing period_size isn't allowed arbitrarilly because it's a hardware constraint. OTOH, avail_min is the software parameter. So avail_min > period_size makes sense in some cases. In my patch I disallowed the case avail_min < period_size because it doesn't work *practically*.
OK, I see, thank you. Now it seems the patch is still not applied. Just to make sure, is it because you are still waiting for the test-case, or just haven't got around to apply it yet? I am asking to make sure that I am not responsible for the delay. :)
Sorry, no, it's just because I've been busy for other things. Will be applied today soon.
thanks,
Takashi