On 08/20/2013 08:18 PM, Nicolin Chen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:28:10PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 01:53:49PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/20/2013 01:07 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
The point is that it might turn into a more correct binding depending on what the S/PDIF device actually is.
There's *never* an object on the board called a "dummy codec".
Oh, is that what you're talking about? Yes, that makes sense. I had been responding to the comments about the transceivers.
I'll remove the 'dummy' words in the next version from the binding doc.
I think the word "CODEC" is also problematic in this context, since whatever is connector to the S/PDIF output path may not be a CODEC. That's why I suggested some more generic property names that IIRC concentrated on enabling rx/tx rather than indicating what was actually connected to the S/PDIF controller.