23 Mar
2015
23 Mar
'15
8 a.m.
Hi Mark
As I mentioned above (and, Simon agreed), I think we can agree if [2/3] patch was exchanged
Do you mean that patch 2/3 should be replaced with soemthing else - if so what should it be replaced by? I've not seen an updated version of this series... [2 Digital signature <application/pgp-signature (7bit)>] No public key for 24D68B725D5487D0 created at 2015-03-23T03:52:37+0900 using RSA
I guess I added my recommend patch on previous mail. If it was not understandable, I can send full-patch-set instead of Lars.
Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto