28 Dec
2020
28 Dec
'20
3:42 a.m.
On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 5:25 AM Jaroslav Kysela perex@perex.cz wrote:
Dne 27. 12. 20 v 9:37 Takashi Iwai napsal(a):
The current code is obviously wrong and the suggested fix goes even to a wronger direction :) The function should return num instead.
I wonder how this did't hit any problem, so far. Maybe 0x prefix was rarely used, fortunately.
It's a bit recent code. I fixed the return value now. It's for \xFF not for 0xFF prefix. Thank you for your investigation, Alex.
Thank you for fixing this properly!
-Alex