Hi,
We recently performed a licensing audit of a larger software project incorporating the Alsa library 1.0.19. One issue we identified was that although the Alsa library purported to state that the library was licensed under the LGPL, there were still several files with third party copyright holders that indicated in their header that the file in question was licensed under the GPL.
Does the Alsa project have some sort of documentation somewhere showing that the third parties consented to the re-licensing under the LGPL, or does it have copies of contributor agreements showing that the copyright holders granted the project organisation rights to re-license under the LGPL?
I realise nobody here is under any obligation to answer any of my questions, but if someone has the time, it would be greatly appreciated!
Regards.
--- Ossi Niiranen Lakimies / Attorney-at-law (NY) Neolex AB Tel. +358 400 414 289 http://www.neolex.fi LinkedIn: http://fi.linkedin.com/in/oniiranen Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/oniiranen
The information contained in this e-mail is privileged and confidential, intended only for the use of the recipient named above. If the reader of this message is not the above mentioned recipient please note that any saving, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please notify us promptly by e-mail at info@neolex.fi should you have received such misdirected messages and kindly destroy this e-mail. Thank You.