23 Jun
2014
23 Jun
'14
6:35 p.m.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 05:29:22PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 04:53:37PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
Whilst there are two things controlling it for a couple of patches they both set the same value one after another, so it should be safe. If it goes into the first patch nothing is controlling the DVFS for a few patches so that actually creates a bisection issue. It could be squashed into the second last patch but this way feels cleaner?
Although looking at that again it can happily merge into the second patch in the series so I will do that.
OK, or if you do want to leave them separate I'd suggest noting why it's safe in the commit log.