Hi
On 07/30/2014 11:54 AM, jianqun wrote:
From: Jianqun xjq@rock-chips.com
Since IRQ pin from max98090 may NC, the irq number will be zero, that is invalid for request_threaded_irq, so just add irq valid check there.
Since hardware may not MUST to use IRQ pin of max98090 as jack detect, the driver can work well without it, can report jack trigger to CPU by a GPIO.
But here driver will register fail caused by failed to request irq.
Signed-off-by: Jianqun xjq@rock-chips.com
sound/soc/codecs/max98090.c | 14 ++++++++------ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/max98090.c b/sound/soc/codecs/max98090.c index 566919c..9dc0e8c 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/max98090.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/max98090.c @@ -2478,12 +2478,14 @@ static int max98090_probe(struct snd_soc_codec *codec) /* Register for interrupts */ dev_dbg(codec->dev, "irq = %d\n", max98090->irq);
- ret = request_threaded_irq(max98090->irq, NULL,
max98090_interrupt, IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT,"max98090_interrupt", codec);- if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(codec->dev, "request_irq failed: %d\n",ret);
- if (max98090->irq) {
ret = request_threaded_irq(max98090->irq, NULL,max98090_interrupt, IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT,"max98090_interrupt", codec);if (ret < 0) {dev_err(codec->dev, "request_irq failed: %d\n",ret);}
Remember to add also "return ret;" at the end of if () {} in case request_threaded_irq() fails since code should not continue probing now after adding a test for valid irq.
Should the if (max98090->irq) test be >0? I'm not sure is there possibility that can i2c->irq actually pass both -1 and 0 depending how struct i2c_board_info etc are initialized?
I forgot that I have a fix changing request_threaded_irq() to devm_request_threaded_irq() so you should redo your patch on top of for-next branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git.