8 May
2012
8 May
'12
3:58 p.m.
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:55:57PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
+dmic_codec: dmic_codec@0 { /* generic DMIC codec */
- compatible = "generic,dmic-codec";
+};
Why is this called "dmic-codec" and not "dmic"? We probably need to have a think about this in the context of the handling of random on-board passive components in general - things like jacks and so on - is the most sensible thing to have a platform device for everything, or is that getting too noisy?