1 Aug
2013
1 Aug
'13
3:13 p.m.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 02:25:22PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 02:16:44PM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
Pointing it to a dummy work callback is cleaner than taking special cases in the code to bypass the flush_delayed_work_sync().
Why is this better than pointing at the normal work that you'd expect to be used there?
By 'normal work' do you mean the close_delayed_work() used for standard PCM DAIs?