Hi,
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 09:50:42PM +0200, Ondrej Zary wrote:
- if (mpu_port[dev] > 0 && mpu_port[dev] != SNDRV_AUTO_PORT)
/* no error if this fails because ES938 is optional */if (snd_es938_init(&chip->es938, card, 0, 0) == 0)snd_printk(KERN_DEBUG "found ES938 audio processor\n");- return 0;
Hmm, how's the braces policy here? Given a double "if" I'd suspect that the outer "if" would want braces then. (perhaps checkpatch.pl has something to say here)
Not to mention that I'm having strong doubts about the kernel's "if" coding style guidelines in general: IMHO *all* uses of "if" ought to be braced: witness the Apple-specific OpenSSL bug catastrophy ("goto fail;"), where people said that adding braces to conditionals would have made things obvious. Plus the annoyance that for an addition commit to an existing conditional the diff will *not* contain the addition only (one line), but rather *three* lines, and the first line rather needlessly getting modified even!
+ if (is_foo) + bar;
So, given a ridiculously simple one-line addition:
- if (is_foo) + if (is_foo) { bar; + boo; + }
Rather than:
+ if (is_foo) { + bar; + }
if (is_foo) { bar; + boo; }
(SIX changed lines vs. 4!)
Not to mention my pet peeve about large sections of coding style documents - they establish Golden Rules to never be broken, but then Fail To Elaborate Why - STUPID! (that does not fully apply to our "if" CodingStyle paragraph though) What a great way to hamper properly thought out evolution of guidelines...
Perhaps we should have a seasoned discussion about that coding style issue, and others? (any update of Documentation/CodingStyle would need to directly include an update to checkpatch.pl, too, though)
(sorry about that part being rather OT to your particular nice patch)
- struct snd_es938_sysex_reg req = {
.midi_cmd = MIDI_CMD_COMMON_SYSEX,.id = ES938_ID,.cmd = ES938_CMD_REG_R,.reg = reg,.midi_end = MIDI_CMD_COMMON_SYSEX_END,- };
Hmm, perhaps const? :) (and dito probably a const void * cast further below, to forego receiving the optionally activated gcc non-const cast warnings)
- end_time = ktime_add_ms(ktime_get(), 100);
Yay! One driver less which is advertising less precise deprecated implementation style :)
- /* check if the reply is our and has SYSEX_END at the end */
"ours"
Thanks,
Andreas Mohr